Is Federalizing DC Police Constitutional?

This is a bit of a read, but if you truly want to understand the legal and Constitutional truth about this please read on through.
Warning- this isn’t for those who put party and personality over truth:
This may not be the popular answer, but it is the constitutional one, we must be very careful about inviting the federal government to police our cities.
For the States, the Constitution deliberately denies Washington, D.C., and federal agencies jurisdiction over local law enforcement because the people must control their own communities and the people cannot control the federal government.
Washington, D.C., however, is different. It is not a state, it is not covered by the
Tenth Amendment, and its only real local protection is the Home Rule Act of 1973. Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 gives Congress exclusive authority over the District, and Congress has delegated most day-to-day policing to D.C.’s local government, at least until it decides otherwise.
That means the President’s executive agencies have a freer hand in D.C. than in any state, but only under the direction of Congress.
But here’s the danger: if we normalize federal policing in D.C. under the plea of necessity, it will be used as precedent to spread into the States. Expanding federal policing powers turns them into a standing army. Maybe not under this president, but the next one could use that power to rule America’s streets like a political king.
That’s not safety, that’s the road to tyranny.
It is important to notice that the DC-State movement is trying to capitalize on this crisis. However, making DC a State would not solve problems, it would amplify them:
The Founders were very deliberate in making sure Washington, D.C. would never be a state. They knew that if the seat of the federal government were inside a state’s borders, that state would gain dangerous leverage over the entire nation.
Imagine if Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court were all physically located in a state whose governor could block access, cut off resources, or use its laws to interfere with federal operations, that state could hold the entire Union hostage.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 gives Congress exclusive legislative authority over the capital to prevent that abuse.
By keeping D.C. independent, they ensured no single state could dominate or intimidate the federal government. Turning D.C. into a state would undo that safeguard and create the very imbalance of power the Constitution was designed to prevent.
Now- who will share and teach this truth.
MORE FROM KRISANNE HALL
Read more current events from a historical, constitutional, and principled perspective, at KrisAnneHall.com.
CLICK HERE for more inspiring content.
Connect with KrisAnne and her Organization
If you want to support KrisAnne Hall’s work or organization, you can make a donation at KrisAnneHall.com or through her organization Liberty First Legal, or join the Liberty First Society for constitutional education and training.
Use the icon links below to connect with and follow her work through social media.
Thank you for your support.
If you appreciate the work we do to spread the good news of Jesus Christ, please consider giving a gift to help us continue this work. Maranatha!
Click an icon below to share this post.
All articles, including blogs and guest articles, published on Encounter News are owned by Encounter Today and Encounter News. The use of any content created and published by Encounter News may be quoted but attribution is required.
Portions of Encounter News articles may be used for reprint and republish purposes, but Encounter News MUST BE CREDITED.
All reprinted or republished articles must:
(1) Identify the author of the article.
(2) Contain the Encounter News byline at the beginning of the article and a hyperlink “Encounter News” to the respective article on the Encounter News website.
(3) Contain, at maximum, three paragraphs and then link back to the original article.


















