One Health is a ‘One World’ Agenda

One Health—a seemingly comprehensive approach to integrating human, animal, and environmental health—is now a part of the negotiations over the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Pandemic Treaty.

Negotiations have been contentious to say the least, but they have brought about an attitude of acceptance that One Health should be embraced due to being painted as being crucial for global health security, as well as bridging geopolitical divides.

During the recent World Health Assembly, discussions on One Health were taking place at an event co-sponsored by Four Paws International and the Geneva Health Forum.

Panelists at the event highlighted strides made by developing countries in applying One Health principles to preempt future disease outbreaks and its potential role in a one world agenda.

Civil society organizations along with a varied number of countries expressed concerns that if measures found within the One Health agenda were implemented, they could lead to new trade barriers and impose costly mandates beyond their financial means.

Reggie Littlejohn, co-founder of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force, spoke out against the One Health Agenda:

“All of these factors lead to human health under the One Health approach and that means they get to surveil all of the areas of human existence…,” she said.

“How are they going to do this? They’re going to do this through digital IDs in part…the pretext of these digital IDs is the idea that in order to protect our health they have to surveil us in terms of whether we’re vaccinated, whether we’re sick…”

Advocates counter this stance, arguing that enhanced cooperation and shared knowledge are essential to prevent future pandemics and local disease outbreaks.

Benjamin Roche, co-founder of PREZODE, an international One Health network, stressed the interconnectedness of global health at the event saying:

“An outbreak in one region can rapidly become a global pandemic,” Roche warned, emphasizing the need for collaborative, cross-sectoral approaches.

Various individuals present at the event called for greater integration to strengthen disease surveillance, as well as bridging gaps between wildlife, agriculture, and public health sectors.

The debate over the role of communities in One Health initiatives remains contentious within the pandemic treaty negotiations.

Littlejohn believes;

“the real purpose of the digital ID can be found on the World Economic Forum website where they have this chart and you will see it this chart that basically you will need to have a digital ID in order to do everything on this chart to access health care insurance and treatment,” she says, “open bank accounts and carry on online transactions, to travel, to access humanitarian services, to shop, to conduct business transactions, to participate in notion in social media, to own a communication device, like a cell phone or a computer, to pay your taxes, collect government benefits and to vote.”

“So if you don’t have a digital ID, you’re going to be shut out of basically every aspect of civilized life on earth.”

“And not only that, but through their surveillance they will be able to tell whether or not you are in compliance, so the surveillance #1 is whether or not you’re vaccinated, but they’re going to be surveilling, if you need a digital ID to access all these things, then there’s gonna be a digital record of you in all of these aspects of your life and what this does is it provides the platform for the China social credit system…”

“When I saw this digital ID I said: Oh my gosh, this is the China social credit system going worldwide. And in China they amalgamate all of these aspects of your life and they give you a score and if you have a high score, you can have freedom and if you have a low score, they will cut you off from your bank accounts, your credit cards and if you keep it up, they will just disappear you.”

“And if you think this can’t happen, it did happen already to the Canadian truckers when they were severed from their bank accounts and their credit cards for having a protest on vaccine mandates.”

Chloe Clifford Astbury, a researcher at York University, emphasized the necessity of integrated surveillance systems and intersectoral collaboration to effectively mitigate pandemic risks.

Meanwhile, Eric Comte, director of the Global Health Forum, emphasized One Health as a crucial bridge between science, policy, and global health security.

“While there’s no one-size-fits-all solution,” Comte remarked, “incremental progress can be achieved through concerted efforts across disciplines and borders.”

As negotiations for the WHO Pandemic Treaty resume, the dialogue must be interrupted and the pressure campaign by the public must remain in order to prevent this globalist goal of literal world domination from being adopted and implemented.

Thank you for your support.

If you appreciate the work we do to spread the good news of Jesus Christ, please consider giving a gift to help us continue this work. Maranatha!